Priligy 60 mg

A BONE IN AMERICA’S THROAT – Jeff Halper

Even before the voting began, Israeli politicians and pundits were asking: Will an Obama Administration be good for Israel? “Be good for Israel” is our code for “Will the US allow us to keep our settlements and continue to support our efforts to prevent negotiations with the Palestinians from ever bearing fruit?” For Americans the question should be: Will the Obama Administration understand that without addressing Palestinian needs it will not be able to disentangle itself from its broader Middle Eastern imbroglios, rejoin the community of nations and rescue its economy?

 

The Israel-Palestine conflict should be of central concern to Americans, near the top of the new Administration’s agenda. It may not be the bloodiest conflict in the world – its minor when compared to Iraq – but it is emblematic to Muslims and to peoples the world over of American hostility and belligerence. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not merely a localized one between two squabbling tribes. It lies at the epicenter of global instability. Go where you may in the world and you will encounter the same phenomenon: a sense that the suffering of the Palestinians represents all that is wrong in an American-dominated world.

 

As Obama comes into office, he will encounter a global reality very different from that of eight years before: a multilateral one in which a weakened and isolated US must find its place. He will discover that much of America’s isolation comes from the view that the Occupation of the Palestinian territories is, in fact, an American-Israeli Occupation. If restoring a weakened American economy depends on repairing relations with the rest of the world, he will learn that without resolving the Israeli-Palestine conflict he will not create those conditions in which the US will be accepted once more into the wider global community.

 

To be more specific, the Israel-Palestine conflict directly affects Americans in at least five ways: 

 

·        It isolates the US from major global markets, forcing it to embark on aggressive measures to secure markets rather than peaceful accommodation;

 

·        It thereby diverts the American economy into non-productive production (tanks not roads), making it dependent upon deficit spending which only increases dependency upon foreign financing while diverting resources into the military rather than into education, health and investment;

 

·        Support for the Israeli military costs US taxpayers more than $3 billion annually at a time of deepening recession and crumbling national infrastructure;

 

·        It leads to an American involvement in the world that is mainly military, thus begetting hostility and resistance which produce the threats to security Americans so greatly fear; and

 

·        It ends up threatening American civil liberties by encouraging such legislation as the Patriot Act and by introducing Israeli “counterinsurgency” tactics and weaponry developed in the West Bank and Gaza into American police forces.

 

For many peoples of the world, the Palestinians represent the plight of the majority. They are the tiny grains of sand resisting what most Americans and privileged people of the West do not see. They are a people who are denied the most fundamental right: to a state of their own, even on the 22% of historic Palestine that Israel has occupied since 1967. For the majority of humanity that lives in economic and political conditions unimaginable in the West, the suffering caused by Israel’s occupation – impoverishment and a total denial of freedom that can only be sustained by total American support – is emblematic of their own continued suffering. Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians with the active backing of the US shows demonstrably the existence of a global system of Western domination that prevents others from achieving their own dreams of political and economic well-being.

 

Like a bone in the throat, the issue of Israel’s occupation can be neither ignored nor by-passed. To make things even more difficult, it is doubtful if a two-state solution is still possible, since Israeli settlement activity has largely eliminated that option. Whatever the eventual solution, if this most destabilizing of conflicts is not addressed, the US – even under Obama – will remain mired in conflicts with Muslim peoples and reviled by peoples seeking genuine freedom. Neither the US nor Israel will find the security they claim they seek. We live in a global reality, not a Pax Americana. The logic of the Bush Administration has run its course. No longer can the US throw its weight around in a War Against Terror. No longer can its involvement be purely military. The new logic that will accompany Obama into office can be summarized in one word: accommodation. And the US will not get to first base until it achieves accommodation with the Muslim world, which means ending the Israeli Occupation. What happens to the Palestinians takes on a global significance. Clearing the bone in the throat – that is, ending the Israeli Occupation and allowing the Palestinians a state and a future of their own – should be a top priority of the next American administration. Indeed, America’s attempt to restore its standing in the world depends on it. In the global reality in which we live, the fate of Americans and Palestinians, it turns out, are closely intertwined.

 

 

(Jeff Halper is the Director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions. He can be reached at <jeff@icahd.org>.)


The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions is based in Jerusalem and has chapters in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Please visit our websites:
www.icahd.org
www.icahduk.org
www.icahdusa.org

A BONE IN AMERICAS THROAT   Jeff Halper

Ziad Khalil Abu Zayyad

A Palestinian-Arab living in East Jerusalem, Ziad graduated from College Des Freres in Jerusalem in 2003. Ziad finished his major in International Relations and English Literature from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ziad is a former President of the Watan student movement at the university. He is interested in Middle Eastern political issues and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Founder of the Middle East Post and MEL (Middle East Future Leadership Network), he represents Palestinian youth at several international conferences.

Website - More Posts

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to A BONE IN AMERICA’S THROAT – Jeff Halper

  1. Ambika says:

    Mr Halper,

    I completely agree with most of what you are saying, especially in the whole realm of America’s new strategy in the area – and that accomodation needs to be the diriving force and not a military might. The question of Israel-Palestine is a key strategic concern for the region, for the people, and for how the world will conduct themselves over the next few years. BUt one cannot forget that other countries play an equally important role in determining the fate of the people in this conflict and if any sustantive step is to be made, these other countries, such as Lebanon, Egypt, Syria need to be brought into the fold.
    By simply stating that the Israel-Palestine conflcit should be at the top of the agenda would mean isolating other issues in both the region such as Iran, and also elsewhere such as Russia and China. US policy needs to change many fold, for any real changes to happen in the world, and for people to honestly believe that Obama is serious about his promises.

  2. Van Sieve says:

    Mr. Halper, I admire the diplomacy that you exercise in editorializing this issue.

    My opinions tend to run a bit more on the blunt side, especially in response to asinine commentary from militant pinheads like Ayman al-Zawahri.

    http://mezzemuff.com/2008/11/dear-ayman-al-zawahri/

    I believe that much of the problem in the Middle East is that the politics are dangerously split where democratic goals of U.S involvement is concerned and where the “religious leaders” in those areas are concerned.

    Perhaps there is a deep fusion of religion and government there that we in the U.S. have a difficult time getting our heads around. But that is also a significant juncture at which dogma becomes the banner under which those groups fight.

    My point is that the U.S. is pursuing the conflicts based on economic and diplomatic grounds where our adversaries are largely pursuing them based on the irrationalities inherent to beliefs – ie intangible ideals that form their cultural anthropology.

  3. james alpert says:

    Its hard to believe what I read.You want the Americans to fix this problem and that there whole being rests upon them doing so? Wow dont you have the pulse of the American people not our goverment put our people. We want out complete 100% not in to fix a problem that is not ours. Not one Arab leader has stepped to the plate to take the reins . Where is Martian Luther King or Mohammad Gandhi.History has shown these two great men moved Oceans with non violence.Not one muslim has shown to be a true leader for its people oh yes I forgot you do have people stepping to the plate in the name of violence.The American people want out. Your examples on how to act in the middle east are nothing I want my children to known.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Best SUV | Thanks to audi suv, infiniti suv and toyota suv

Slider by webdesign